Simonida Vilić1, Tatjana Dujaković2
1University PIM, Faculty of Economics, despota Stefana Lazarevića bb, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, svilic26@yahoo.com
2 Republic Administration for Inspection Affairs, Trg Republike Srpske 8, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER
ISSN 2637-2150
e-ISSN 2637-2614
UDC 343.352/.353:343.85
10.7251/STED2202042V
Paper Submitted: 15.10.2022.
Paper Accepted: 25.11.2022.
Paper Published: 30.11.2022.
http://stedj-univerzitetpim.com
Corresponding Author:
Simonida Vilić, Univerzitet PIM, Ekonomski fakultet, despota Stefana Lazarevića bb, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosna i Hercegovina, svilic26@yahoo.com
Copyright © 2022 Simonida Vilić & Tatjana Dujaković; published by UNIVERSITY PIM. This work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.
ABSTRACT
Corruption is undoubtedly present everywhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in all pores of society and on an increasing scale. The fight against corruption is a great challenge for the most developed countries in the world. Therefore, it is not surprising that Bosnia and Herzegovina, burdened by political problems and poverty, finds it difficult to find effective mechanisms to combat this extremely negative phenomenon. The reasons for poor results in the prosecution of corrupt crimes range from the very nature of the phenomenon of corruption, which is shrouded in secrecy due to the interests of participants, which makes it difficult to disclose, to insufficiently good institutional and legal solutions. The aim of this paper is to determine the awareness of B&H citizens about corruption in the workplace and the way they relate to corruption in everyday life, but also to analyze the performance of state institutions in preventing and combating corruption. Based on the defined problem to be investigated and the set goals, the methodology used during the research was determined. The scientific-research character of this paper is based on the analysis of relevant scientific literature and modern sources using the methods of examination, methods of analysis, methods of comparison, methods of description and methods of deduction.
Key words: corruption, prevention, suppression.
